An IDR arbitrator is weighing a specific set of factors, and the submissions that win tend to engage those factors directly rather than arguing the case in general terms. The QPA the payer proposed, comparable market rates for the service, and the specific circumstances of the case (complexity, training, prior contracting history) all carry weight. A submission that doesn't address the QPA head on, with a specific, documented reason it's too low, starts from a weaker position regardless of how strong the underlying case is.
The most common filing mistake isn't a weak case, it's a generic one. Submissions that could apply to almost any dispute, without the specific comparable data and documentation that ties directly to this claim, tend to underperform submissions built around the actual QPA calculation and a clear rebuttal.
Written by John M. Abrahams, MD — board-certified neurosurgeon, founder of New York Brain & Spine Surgery.
Related: Mastering Out-of-Network Billing & the NSA
More in Out-of-network billing: The No Surprises Act, Explained for Physicians · Is Out of Network Billing Still Viable After the No Surprises Act